Following several high-profile fatal crashes involving drivers operating with non-domiciled CDLs, including reports that the drivers were unable to communicate effectively in English, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (USDOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMSCA) has increased enforcement of existing regulations and is considering additional rulemaking to improve highway safety and reduce fatal truck crashes.
2025 saw initial impacts from regulatory enforcement changes in the industry with immigration-related policies directly affecting the commercial driver workforce. The impact of these changes accelerated in 2026.
Non-Domiciled CDLs: FMCSA guidance is tightening eligibility for non-domiciled commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders and pushing states to audit or revoke credentials that do not meet federal expectations.
English Language Proficiency (ELP): Stricter ELP enforcement is having a more immediate impact on capacity as a driver can be placed out-of-service for failing to pass a proficiency evaluation during a roadside inspection.
Cabotage: The tightened enforcement of cabotage regulations has reduced the frequency of foreign-registered trucks picking up and delivering domestic loads.
Electronic Logging Devices (ELD): FMCSA is in the process of rolling out major ELD rule revisions following the release of the USDOT regulatory agenda. Key updates include proposed rulemakings to address compliance loopholes, an overhaul of the ELD vetting process to block non-compliant devices and a new revoked devices list.
Since January 2025, FMCSA has removed 79 devices that failed to meet Federal standards. Motor carriers have 90 days to replace the revoked ELDs with a compliant ELD – drivers using a revoked device after that date could be placed out-of-service by safety officials.
Additional regulatory and legislative changes, outlined below, could place further pressure on the pool of compliant carriers available to move freight in the U.S.
Dalilah’s Law: A bill known as Dalilah’s Law advanced by the U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee aims to permanently write into federal law the tighter CDL standards that are already being enforced by FMCSA – adding English-only CDL testing, cracking down on fraudulent CDL training schools and banning foreign dispatch and broker activity.
If enacted, these requirements could increase compliance obligations across segments of the transportation industry and contribute to greater competition for vetted, compliant carrier capacity.
Motus: This new USDOT registration system works to strengthen oversight, reduce fraud, improve data accuracy and simplify registration management for the trucking industry. Carriers now have a single location to apply for a USDOT number, apply for motor carrier operating authority (MC authority), update company information, complete registration updates and maintain compliance with FMCSA registration requirements.
Because Motus introduces stronger identity verification and registration controls, it should make it more difficult for bad actors to obtain operating authority. This system introduces additional verification and identity-validation measures designed to improve registration integrity. As a result, some applicants may experience increased documentation and verification requirements before receiving operating authority, which may create a higher barrier to entry for new applicants.
Montgomery v. Caribe: In May 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act does not preempt a state-law claim alleging that a freight broker negligently selected a motor carrier. The decision permits those claims to proceed under applicable state negligence law, but it does not impose automatic lability or establish a uniform national standard for carrier selection.
Because standards of reasonable care will continue to be developed through state-law negligence principles and case-specific facts, the decision is likely to increase scrutiny of broker carrier-selection practices. Brokers may respond by documenting and, where appropriate, strengthening carrier-vetting processes.
More selective carrier vetting processes may impact capacity in at least two ways – by adding a barrier to entry for new carriers and by removing existing capacity from the market as smaller carrier fleets are affected by more stringent requirements (90%+ of authorized carriers operate without an FMCSA rating, according to Chris Burroughs, President and CEO for the Transportation Intermediaries Association). The absence of an FMCSA safety rating does not, by itself, suggest that a carrier is unsafe. However, limited federal rating information may cause brokers to rely on additional safety, operating-history and identity-verification information when selecting carriers.